Assertion: Just One Way to Take It Back

Logos and Episteme 7 (3):385-391 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Jonathan Kvanvig, the practice of taking back one’s assertion when finding out that one has been mistaken or gettiered fails to speak in favour of a knowledge norm of assertion. To support this claim, he introduces a distinction between taking back the content of the assertion, and taking back the speech act itself. This paper argues that Kvanvig’s distinction does not successfully face close speech-act-theoretic scrutiny. Furthermore, I offer an alternative diagnosis of the target cases sourced in the normativity of action.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SIMAJO
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reply to Simion.Kvanvig, Jonathan L.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-08

Total views
80 ( #27,352 of 40,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #15,510 of 40,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.