Assertion: Just One Way to Take It Back

Logos and Episteme 7 (3):385-391 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Jonathan Kvanvig, the practice of taking back one’s assertion when finding out that one has been mistaken or gettiered fails to speak in favour of a knowledge norm of assertion. To support this claim, he introduces a distinction between taking back the content of the assertion, and taking back the speech act itself. This paper argues that Kvanvig’s distinction does not successfully face close speech-act-theoretic scrutiny. Furthermore, I offer an alternative diagnosis of the target cases sourced in the normativity of action.

Author's Profile

Mona Simion
University of St. Andrews

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-08

Downloads
401 (#43,140)

6 months
71 (#65,733)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?