Confusion and dependence in uses of history

Synthese 184 (3):261-286 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many people argue that history makes a special difference to the subjects of biology and psychology, and that history does not make this special difference to other parts of the world. This paper will show that historical properties make no more or less of a difference to biology or psychology than to chemistry, physics, or other sciences. Although historical properties indeed make a certain kind of difference to biology and psychology, this paper will show that historical properties make the same kind of difference to geology, sociology, astronomy, and other sciences. Similarly, many people argue that nonhistorical properties make a special difference to the nonbiological and the nonpsychological world. This paper will show that nonhistorical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their causal behavior and that historical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their distributions. Although history is special, it is special in the same way to all parts of the world
Reprint years
2012
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SLUCAD
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Functional Analysis.Cummins, Robert
In Defense of Proper Functions.Millikan, Ruth Garrett

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-09-19

Total views
634 ( #4,073 of 42,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
93 ( #5,346 of 42,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.