Chisholm's Phenomenal Argument Revisited: A Dilemma for Perdurantism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to perdurantism, objects persist by being spread out over time, just as composite three-dimensional objects are spread out over space. Just as a composite three-dimensional object is spread out over space by having spatial parts, objects persist, according to perdurantism, by having temporal parts. Perdurantism can be stated more precisely by saying what exactly a temporal part is. In the sequel, Theodore Sider's definition of "instantaneous temporal part" shall be assumed: x is an instantaneous temporal part of y at instant t =df. x exists at, but only at, t; x is part of y at t; and x overlaps at t everything that is part of y at t. Much more could be and has been said about how perdurantism should be formulated. Though interesting in their own right, nothing of importance here turns on these matters of formulation
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMICPA-6
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-05-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-10-26

Total views
54 ( #64,149 of 72,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #42,844 of 72,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.