Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is a basic distinction, in the realm of spatial boundaries, between bona fide boundaries on the one hand, and fiat boundaries on the other. The former are just the physical boundaries of old. The latter are exemplified especially by boundaries induced through human demarcation, for example in the geographic domain. The classical problems connected with the notions of adjacency, contact, separation and division can be resolved in an intuitive way by recognizing this two-sorted ontology of boundaries. Bona fide boundaries yield a notion of contact that is effectively modeled by classical topology; the analogue of contact involving fiat boundaries calls, however, for a different account, based on the intuition that fiat boundaries do not support the open/closed distinction on which classical topology is based. In the presence of this two-sorted ontology it then transpires that mereotopology—topology erected on a mereological basis—is more than a trivial formal variant of classical point-set topology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2018-07-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Vague Objects.Tye, Michael
Fiat Objects.Smith, Barry
The Child's Conception of Space.Piaget, Jean; Inhelder, Baerbel; Langdon, F. J. & Lunzer, J. L.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fiat Objects.Smith, Barry
Sixteen Days.Smith, Barry & Brogaard, Berit

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
537 ( #6,824 of 47,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #18,600 of 47,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.