Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is a basic distinction, in the realm of spatial boundaries, between bona fide boundaries on the one hand, and fiat boundaries on the other. The former are just the physical boundaries of old. The latter are exemplified especially by boundaries induced through human demarcation, for example in the geographic domain. The classical problems connected with the notions of adjacency, contact, separation and division can be resolved in an intuitive way by recognizing this two-sorted ontology of boundaries. Bona fide boundaries yield a notion of contact that is effectively modeled by classical topology; the analogue of contact involving fiat boundaries calls, however, for a different account, based on the intuition that fiat boundaries do not support the open/closed distinction on which classical topology is based. In the presence of this two-sorted ontology it then transpires that mereotopology—topology erected on a mereological basis—is more than a trivial formal variant of classical point-set topology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIFAB
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2018-07-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness in Geography.Varzi, Achille C.
Mereotopological Connection.Cohn, Anthony G. & Varzi, Achille C.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
448 ( #4,488 of 35,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #13,637 of 35,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.