Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is a basic distinction, in the realm of spatial boundaries, between bona fide boundaries on the one hand, and fiat boundaries on the other. The former are just the physical boundaries of old. The latter are exemplified especially by boundaries induced through human demarcation, for example in the geographic domain. The classical problems connected with the notions of adjacency, contact, separation and division can be resolved in an intuitive way by recognizing this two-sorted ontology of boundaries. Bona fide boundaries yield a notion of contact that is effectively modeled by classical topology; the analogue of contact involving fiat boundaries calls, however, for a different account, based on the intuition that fiat boundaries do not support the open/closed distinction on which classical topology is based. In the presence of this two-sorted ontology it then transpires that mereotopology—topology erected on a mereological basis—is more than a trivial formal variant of classical point-set topology.
ISBN(s)
0031-8205
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIFAB
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2018-07-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
588 ( #7,572 of 54,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #15,977 of 54,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.