Laws of Essence or Constitutive Rules? Reinach vs. Searle on the Ontology of Social Entities

In Francesca De Vecchi (ed.), Eidetica del Diritto e Ontologia Sociale. Il Realismo di Adolf Reinach. Mimesis. pp. 83-108 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Amongst the entities making up social reality, are there necessary relations whose necessity is not a mere reflection of the logical connections between corresponding concepts? We distinguish three main groups of answers to this question, associated with Hume and Adolf Reinach at opposite extremes, and with Searle who occupies a position somewhere in the middle. We first set forth Reinach’s views on what he calls ‘material necessities’ in the realm of social entities. We then attempt to show that Searle has not identified a sustainable position somewhere between the Humean and the Reinachian extremes. This is because Searle’s position is threatened by circularity, and to steer clear of that danger it must incorporate at least some elements of Reinach’s essentialism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMILOE
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.
Logische Untersuchungen.Husserl, Edmund (ed.)

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-29

Total views
218 ( #15,719 of 43,009 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #29,824 of 43,009 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.