The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Part 1 of this exchange consists in a critique by Smith of Searle’s The Construction of Social Reality focusing on Searle’s use of the formula ‘X counts as Y in context C’. Smith argues that this formula works well for social objects such as dollar bills and presidents where the corresponding X terms (pieces of paper, human beings) are easy to identify. In cases such as debts and prices and money in a banks computers, however, the formula fails, because these are cases of what he calls ‘free-standing Y terms’, since there is here no X which can count as the corresponding Y. In his response in Part 2, Searle argues that Smith’s critique rests on three misunderstandings: 1. in wrongly presupposing that Searle is trying to analyze the nature of what he calls “social objects”, rather than of social facts; 2. in thinking that the counts as formula is intended as a definition, rather than as a mere mnemonic; and 3. in neglecting the naturalism of Searle’s account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMITCO-23
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-12-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Developing the Incentivized Action View of Institutional Reality.Smit, J. P.; Buekens, Filip & du Plessis, Stan

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-07-03

Total downloads
1,138 ( #988 of 35,452 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
156 ( #1,695 of 35,452 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.