The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange
American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2):285-309 (2003)
Abstract
Part 1 of this exchange consists in a critique by Smith of Searle’s The Construction of Social Reality focusing on Searle’s use of the formula ‘X counts as Y in context C’. Smith argues that this formula works well for social objects such as dollar bills and presidents where the corresponding X terms (pieces of paper, human beings) are easy to identify. In cases such as debts and prices and money in a bank's computers, however, the formula fails, because these are cases of what he calls ‘free-standing Y terms’, since there is here no X which can count as the corresponding Y. In his response in Part 2, Searle argues that Smith’s critique rests on three misunderstandings: 1. in wrongly presupposing that Searle is trying to analyze the nature of what he calls “social objects”, rather than of social facts; 2. in thinking that the counts as formula is intended as a definition, rather than as a mere mnemonic; and 3. in neglecting the naturalism of Searle’s account.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMITCO-23
Upload history
Added to PP index
2013-07-03
Total views
1,925 ( #1,553 of 58,439 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
173 ( #2,886 of 58,439 )
2013-07-03
Total views
1,925 ( #1,553 of 58,439 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
173 ( #2,886 of 58,439 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.