The Chinese rune argument

Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66-74 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Searle’s tool for understanding culture, law and society is the opposition between brute reality and institutional reality, or in other words between: observer-independent features of the world, such as force, mass and gravitational attraction, and observer-relative features of the world, such as money, property, marriage and government. The question posed here is: under which of these two headings do moral concepts fall? This is an important question because there are moral facts – for example pertaining to guilt and responsibility – which hover uncomfortably close to the boundary between the observer-relative and the observer-independent. By means of a thought experiment involving an imagined Chinese society in which guilt is determined by the random throwing of sticks, I seek to show that moral concepts threaten the foundations of Searle’s philosophy of social reality.
Reprint years
2000, 2001
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMITCR-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Rationality in Action.Searle, John R.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 184 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
694 ( #5,164 of 50,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #8,236 of 50,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.