Unacknowledged Permissivism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (1):158-183 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Epistemic permissivism is the view that it is possible for two people to rationally hold incompatible attitudes toward some proposition on the basis of one body of evidence. In this paper, I defend a particular version of permissivism – unacknowledged permissivism (UP) – which says that permissivism is true, but that no one can ever rationally believe that she is in a permissive case. I show that counter to what virtually all authors who have discussed UP claim, UP is an attractive view: it is compatible with the intuitive motivations for permissivism and avoids a significant challenge to permissivism: the arbitrariness objection.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-09-30
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
336 ( #20,716 of 65,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #8,745 of 65,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.