Principles of Interpretive Charity and the Semantics of Knowledge Attributions

Acta Analytica 31 (2):153-168 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Positions in the debate about the correct semantics of “S knows that p” are sometimes motivated in part by an appeal to interpretive charity. In particular, non-skeptical views hold that many utterances of the sentence “S knows that p” are true and some of them think the fact that their views are able to respect this is a reason why their views are more charitable than skeptical invariantism. However, little attention has been paid to why charity should be understood in this way and little effort has been spent justifying the notion that a charitable semantics is likely to be true. I distinguish two kinds of interpretive charity. One principle of charity is often appealed to in the literature. I introduce a second. I argue that while some positions better respect one principle of charity, the reverse is true of the other principle of charity. I conclude with some remarks about how to break this apparent tie.

Author's Profile

Gregory Stoutenburg
York College Of Pennsylvania

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-24

Downloads
296 (#47,959)

6 months
52 (#71,353)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?