Does the exclusion argument put any pressure on dualism?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1):96-108 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The exclusion argument is widely thought to put considerable pressure on dualism if not to refute it outright. We argue to the contrary that, whether or not their position is ultimately true, dualists have a plausible response. The response focuses on the notion of ‘distinctness’ as it occurs in the argument: if 'distinctness' is understood one way, the exclusion principle on which the argument is founded can be denied by the dualist; if it is understood another way, the argument is not persuasive.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STOWAD
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Physicalism.Tiehen, Justin

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
419 ( #10,312 of 50,412 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #20,538 of 50,412 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.