On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities

Theoria 75 (4):344-357 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper challenges the Kripkean interpretation of a posteriori necessities. It will be demonstrated, by an analysis of classic examples, that the modal content of supposed a posteriori necessities is more complicated than the Kripkean line suggests. We will see that further research is needed concerning the a priori principles underlying all a posteriori necessities. In the course of this analysis it will emerge that the modal content of a posteriori necessities can be best described in terms of a Finean conception of modality – by giving essences priority over modality. The upshot of this is that we might be able to establish the necessity of certain supposed a posteriori necessities by a priori means.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAHOTM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Reference and Essence.Salmon, Nathan U.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-05-20

Total downloads
448 ( #4,859 of 36,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #10,399 of 36,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.