Advice for the Steady: Decision Theory and the Requirements of Instrumental Rationality

Dissertation, (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Standard decision theory, or rational choice theory, is often interpreted to be a theory of instrumental rationality. This dissertation argues, however, that the core requirements of orthodox decision theory cannot be defended as general requirements of instrumental rationality. Instead, I argue that these requirements can only be instrumentally justified to agents who have a desire to have choice dispositions that are stable over time and across different choice contexts. Past attempts at making instrumentalist arguments for the core requirements of decision theory fail due to a pervasive assumption in decision theory, namely the assumption that the agent’s preferences over the objects of choice – be it outcomes or uncertain prospects – form the standard of instrumental rationality against which the agent’s actions are evaluated. I argue that we should instead take more basic desires to be the standard of instrumental rationality. But unless agents have a desire to have stable choice dispositions, according to this standard, instrumental rationality turns out to be more permissive than orthodox decision theory.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
THOAFT-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Temptation and Preference-Based Instrumental Rationality.Johanna Thoma - 2018 - In José Bermudez (ed.), Self-control, decision theory and rationality. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-16

Total views
113 ( #23,006 of 40,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #5,423 of 40,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.