The Good, the Bad, and the Badass: On the Descriptive Adequacy of Kant's Conception of Moral Evil

In Significance and System: Essays on Kant's Ethics. New York, USA: pp. 293-330 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter argues for an interpretation of Kant's psychology of moral evil that accommodates the so-called excluded middle cases and allows for variations in the magnitude of evil. The strategy involves distinguishing Kant's transcendental psychology from his empirical psychology and arguing that Kant's character rigorism is restricted to the transcendental level. The chapter also explains how Kant's theory of moral evil accommodates 'the badass'; someone who does evil for evil's sake.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TIMTGT
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.
Kant's Empirical Psychology.Frierson, Patrick R.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-05

Total views
106 ( #26,787 of 43,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #28,868 of 43,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.