Geachianism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The plane was going to crash, but it didn't. Johnny was going to bleed to death, but he didn't. Geach sees here a changing future. In this paper, I develop Geach's primary argument for the (almost universally rejected) thesis that the future is mutable (an argument from the nature of prevention), respond to the most serious objections such a view faces, and consider how Geach's view bears on traditional debates concerning divine foreknowledge and human freedom. As I hope to show, Geach's view constitutes a radically new view on the logic of future contingents, and deserves the status of a theoretical contender in these debates.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TODG
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fatalism and Future Contingents.Giacomo Andreoletti - 2019 - Analytic Philosophy 60 (3):1-14.
On Behalf of a Mutable Future.Patrick Todd - 2016 - Synthese 193 (7):2077-2095.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-02-07

Total views
770 ( #3,162 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #5,644 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.