Geachianism

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:222-251 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The plane was going to crash, but it didn't. Johnny was going to bleed to death, but he didn't. Geach sees here a changing future. In this paper, I develop Geach's primary argument for the (almost universally rejected) thesis that the future is mutable (an argument from the nature of prevention), respond to the most serious objections such a view faces, and consider how Geach's view bears on traditional debates concerning divine foreknowledge and human freedom. As I hope to show, Geach's view constitutes a radically new view on the logic of future contingents, and deserves the status of a theoretical contender in these debates.

Author's Profile

Patrick Todd
University of Edinburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-07

Downloads
1,249 (#4,644)

6 months
38 (#26,258)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?