Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit? [Book Review]

Political Theory 44 (3):410-420 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Is there more to the recent surge in political realism than just a debate on how best to continue doing what political theorists are already doing? I use two recent books, by Michael Freeden and Matt Sleat, as a testing ground for realism’s claims about its import on the discipline. I argue that both book take realism beyond the Methodenstreit, though each in a different direction: Freeden’s takes us in the realm of meta-metatheory, Sleat’s is a genuine exercise in grounding liberal normative theory in a non-moralistic way. I conclude with wider methodological observations. I argue that unlike communitarianism, realism has the potential to open new vistas, though their novelty is to a large extent relative to the last forty years or so: realism is best thought of as a return to a more traditional way of doing political philosophy
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 4 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Facts, Principles, and Politics.Enzo Rossi - forthcoming - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-16.
Introduction.Sabl, Andrew & Sagar, Rahul

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
345 ( #6,859 of 36,554 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #14,062 of 36,554 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.