Knowledge central: A central role for knowledge attributions in social evaluations

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Five experiments demonstrate the central role of knowledge attributions in social evaluations. In Experiments 1–3, we manipulated whether an agent believes, is certain of, or knows a true proposition and asked people to rate whether the agent should perform a variety of actions. We found that knowledge, more so than belief or certainty, leads people to judge that the agent should act. In Experiments 4–5, we investigated whether attributions of knowledge or certainty can explain an important finding on how people act based on statistical evidence, known as “the Wells effect”. We found that knowledge attributions, but not certainty attributions, mediate this effect on decision making. 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments.John Turri, Wesley Buckwalter & David Rose - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):212-222.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #47,770 of 50,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #29,607 of 50,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.