Representing knowledge

The Philosophical Review 130 (1):97-143 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A speaker's use of a declarative sentence in a context has two effects: it expresses a proposition and represents the speaker as knowing that proposition. This essay is about how to explain the second effect. The standard explanation is act-based. A speaker is represented as knowing because their use of the declarative in a context tokens the act-type of assertion and assertions represent knowledge in what's asserted. I propose a semantic explanation on which declaratives covertly host a "know"-parenthetical. A speaker is thereby represented as knowing the proposition expressed because that is the semantic contribution of the parenthetical. I call this view parentheticalism and defend that it better explains knowledge representation than alternatives. As a consequence of outperforming assertoric explanations, parentheticalism opens the door to eliminating the act-type of assertion from linguistic theorizing.
Reprint years
2021
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANRK
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-11-20
Latest version: 2 (2019-11-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-11-20

Total views
484 ( #13,837 of 65,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #9,606 of 65,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.