The Meanings of “Imagine” Part II: Attitude and Action

Philosophy Compass 9 (11):791-802 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this Part II, I investigate different approaches to the question of what makes imagining different from belief. I find that the sentiment-based approach of David Hume falls short, as does the teleological approach, once advocated by David Velleman. I then consider whether the inferential properties of beliefs and imaginings may differ. Beliefs, I claim, exhibit an anti-symmetric inferential governance over imaginings: they are the background that makes inference from one imagining to the other possible; the reverse is not true, and this allows us to distinguish the two attitudes. I then go on to consider the action theory of imagining and the role that imaginings play in generating emotion
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANTMO-8
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doxastic Deliberation.Shah, Nishi & David Velleman, J.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Biased by Our Imaginings.Sullivan‐Bissett, Ema

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-03-06

Total views
446 ( #5,336 of 38,092 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #9,444 of 38,092 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.