Fischer against the dilemma defence: the defence prevails

Analysis 73 (2):283-295 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent paper, John Fischer develops a new argument against the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) based on a deterministic scenario. Fischer uses this result (i) to rebut the Dilemma Defense - a well-known incompatibilist response to Frankfurt-type counterexamples to PAP; and (ii) to maintain that: If causal determinism rules out moral responsibility, it is not just in virtue of eliminating alternative possibilities. In this article, we argue that Fischer's new argument against PAP fails, thus leaving points (i) and (ii) unsupported

Author's Profile

David Widerker
Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan


Added to PP

1,129 (#11,992)

6 months
109 (#47,602)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?