Fischer against the dilemma defence: the defence prevails

Analysis 73 (2):283-295 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a recent paper, John Fischer develops a new argument against the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) based on a deterministic scenario. Fischer uses this result (i) to rebut the Dilemma Defense - a well-known incompatibilist response to Frankfurt-type counterexamples to PAP; and (ii) to maintain that: If causal determinism rules out moral responsibility, it is not just in virtue of eliminating alternative possibilities. In this article, we argue that Fischer's new argument against PAP fails, thus leaving points (i) and (ii) unsupported
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIDFAT
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-22

Total views
790 ( #6,908 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,324 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.