Double trouble: Should double embryo transfer be banned?

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (2):121-139 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What role should legislation or policy play in avoiding the complications of in-vitro fertilization? In this article, we focus on single versus double embryo transfer, and assess three arguments in favour of mandatory single embryo transfer: risks to the mother, risks to resultant children, and costs to society. We highlight significant ethical concerns about each of these. Reproductive autonomy and non-paternalism are strong enough to outweigh the health concerns for the woman. Complications due to non-identity cast doubt on the extent to which children are harmed. Twinning may offer an overall benefit rather than burden to society. Finally, including the future health costs for children in reproductive policy is inconsistent with other decisions. We conclude that mandatory single embryo transfer is not justified and that a number of countries should reconsider their current embryo transfer policy
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Margolis, Joseph

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is the Non-Identity Problem Relevant to Public Health and Policy? An Online Survey.Doolabh, Keyur; Caviola, Lucius; Savulescu, Julian; Selgelid, Michael J. & Wilkinson, Dominic

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
230 ( #18,728 of 48,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #9,798 of 48,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.