Eugenics Offended

Monash Bioethics Review 39 (2):169-176 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This commentary continues an exchange on eugenics in Monash Bioethics Review between Anomaly (2018), Wilson (2019), and Veit, Anomaly, Agar, Singer, Fleischman, and Minerva (2021). The eponymous question, “Can ‘Eugenics’ be Defended?”, is multiply ambiguous and does not receive a clear answer from Veit et al.. Despite their stated desire to move beyond mere semantics to matters of substance, Veit et al. concentrate on several uses of the term “eugenics” that pull in opposite directions. I argue, first, that Veit et al. (2021) makes much the same error as does Anomaly (2018) in characterizing eugenics; second, that the paper misunderstands the relationship between eugenics and enhancement; and third, that it distorts the views expressed in my “Eugenics Undefended”.
Reprint years
2021
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILEO-4
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-11-27
Latest version: 2 (2021-12-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-11-27

Total views
48 ( #58,310 of 65,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #17,795 of 65,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.