Intertranslatability, Theoretical Equivalence, and Perversion

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I investigate syntactic notions of theoretical equivalence between logical theories and a recent objection thereto. I show that this recent criticism of syntactic accounts, as extensionally inadequate, is unwarranted by developing an account which is plausibly extensionally adequate and more philosophically motivated. This is important for recent anti-exceptionalist treatments of logic since syntactic accounts require less theoretical baggage than semantic accounts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-17
Latest version: 2 (2018-02-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Glymour and Quine on Theoretical Equivalence.Barrett, Thomas William & Halvorson, Hans

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Substructural Logics, Pluralism and Collapse.Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Pailos, Federico & Szmuc, Damian

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
148 ( #17,104 of 38,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #14,196 of 38,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.