Intertranslatability, Theoretical Equivalence, and Perversion

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I investigate syntactic notions of theoretical equivalence between logical theories and a recent objection thereto. I show that this recent criticism of syntactic accounts, as extensionally inadequate, is unwarranted by developing an account which is plausibly extensionally adequate and more philosophically motivated. This is important for recent anti-exceptionalist treatments of logic since syntactic accounts require less theoretical baggage than semantic accounts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-01-17
Latest version: 2 (2018-02-14)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
370 ( #17,486 of 2,448,791 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #25,369 of 2,448,791 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.