What to believe about your belief that you're in the good case

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Going about our daily lives in an orderly manner requires us, once we are aware of them, to dismiss many metaphysical possibilities. We take it for granted that we are not brains in vats, or living in the Matrix, or in an extended dream. Call these things that we take for granted “anti-skeptical assumptions”. What should a reflective agent who believes these things think of these beliefs? For various reasons, it can seem that we do not have evidence for such anti-skeptical assumptions. Are anti-skeptical assumptions, then, beliefs that one may rationally hold without evidence for them – indeed, even in the face of a positive judgment that one lacks evidence for them? I survey and criticize some prominent answers to this question, and then offer a positive view that blends externalism about evidence with a mild, qualified kind of pragmatism. The view I offer aims to do justice to the sense that anti-skeptical assumptions are evidentially groundless while also maintaining that one cannot rationally believe something that one judges oneself to lack sufficient evidence for.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
217 ( #20,109 of 50,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #18,514 of 50,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.