Sensitivity, Safety, and Epistemic Closure

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (1):56-71 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It has been argued that an advantage of the safety account over the sensitivity account is that the safety account preserves epistemic closure, while the sensitivity account implies epistemic closure failure. However, the argument fails to take the method-relativity of the modal conditions on knowledge, viz., sensitivity and safety, into account. In this paper, I argue that the sensitivity account and the safety account are on a par with respect to epistemic closure once the method-relativity of the modal conditions is taken into account. Therefore, epistemic closure is no longer an arbiter in the debate.

Author's Profile

Bin Zhao
Peking University


Added to PP

805 (#18,648)

6 months
277 (#8,182)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?