O que é "verdadeiro, mas não esclarecedor" segundo a Ética Eudêmia

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Eudemian Ethics I 6, Aristotle describes the progress of the ethical investigation as a drift from a) what is true but not clarifying to b) what is true and clarifying. The drift from a) to b) is usually interpreted as the overcome of a first obscure and confused grasp of the subject by a more accurate and reliable account. In this paper, I claim that the understanding of the methodological role of a) depends upon its dissociation from the notions of obscurity and confusion. What is true but not clarifying should be rather understood as a first indistinct (but not confused) grasp of the subject. Its insuficiency as regards explanation is to be accounted on the base of its indistinctness and not on its supposed obscurity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZILOQ
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-05-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-05-03

Total views
54 ( #45,473 of 54,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #48,527 of 54,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.