Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Discussion. Comments on Laraudogoitia's 'classical particle dynamics, indeterminism and a supertask'.J. Earman - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):123-133.
    We discuss two supertasks invented recently by Laraudogoitia [1996, 1997], Both involve an infinite number of particle collisions within a finite amount of time and both compromise determinism. We point out that the sources of the indeterminism are rather different in the two cases - one involves unbounded particle velocities, the other involves particles with no lower bound to their sizes - and consequently that the implications for determinism are rather different - one form of indeterminism affects Newtonian but not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Earman and Norton on Supertasks That Generate Indeterminism.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):137 - 141.
    In a recent discussion, Earman and Norton [(1998)] propose a classification of supertasks that generate indeterminism which is flawed. An emendation is presented here.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Tasks and Supertasks.James Thomson - 1954 - Analysis 15 (1):1--13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • Note on Achilles and the tortoise.C. D. Broad - 1913 - Mind 22 (4):318-b-319.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica.Isaac Newton - 1726 - Filozofia 56 (5):341-354.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   198 citations  
  • Newtonian supertasks: A critical analysis.Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger - 1998 - Synthese 114 (2):355-369.
    In two recent papers Perez Laraudogoitia has described a variety of supertasks involving elastic collisions in Newtonian systems containing a denumerably infinite set of particles. He maintains that these various supertasks give examples of systems in which energy is not conserved, particles at rest begin to move spontaneously, particles disappear from a system, and particles are created ex nihilo. An analysis of these supertasks suggests that they involve systems that do not satisfy the mathematical conditions required of Newtonian systems at (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • .Jeremy Butterfield & John Earman - 1977
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   368 citations  
  • Zeno's race course.Gregory Vlastos - 1966 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (2):95-108.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Tasks, super-tasks, and the modern eleatics.Paul Benacerraf - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (24):765-784.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. Adolf Grünbaum. [REVIEW]Peter Caws - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (1):106-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Discussion. Earman and Norton on supertasks that generate indeterminism.J. P. Laraudogoitia - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):137-141.
    In a recent discussion, Earman and Norton [(1998)] propose a classification of supertasks that generate indeterminism which is flawed. An emendation is presented here.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A beautiful supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • (1 other version)Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics.David Atkinson - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):170-180.
    A Zenonian supertask involving an infinite number of colliding balls is considered, under the restriction that the total mass of all the balls is finite. Classical mechanics leads to the conclusion that momentum, but not necessarily energy, must be conserved. Relativistic mechanics, on the other hand, implies that energy and momentum conservation are always violated. Quantum mechanics, however, seems to rule out the Zeno configuration as an inconsistent system.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics.David Atkinson - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):170-180.
    A Zenonian supertask involving an infinite number of colliding balls is considered, under the restriction that the total mass of all the balls is finite. Classical mechanics leads to the conclusion that momentum, but not necessarily energy, must be conserved. Relativistic mechanics, on the other hand, implies that energy and momentum conservation are always violated. Quantum mechanics, however, seems to rule out the Zeno configuration as an inconsistent system.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • A relativistic Zeno effect.David Atkinson - 2006 - Synthese 160 (1):5-12.
    A Zenonian supertask involving an infinite number of identical colliding balls is generalized to include balls with different masses. Under the restriction that the total mass of all the balls is finite, classical mechanics leads to velocities that have no upper limit. Relativistic mechanics results in velocities bounded by that of light, but energy and momentum are not conserved, implying indeterminism. The notion that both determinism and the conservation laws might be salvaged via photon creation is shown to be flawed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations