Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. “Letter on humanism”.Martin Heidegger - unknown
    I am trying...to go back through all those places where I was exiled-enclosed so he could constitute his there. To read his text to try to take back from it what he took from me irrecoverably...I am trying to re-discover the possibility of a relation to air. Don’t I need one, well before starting to speak?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   304 citations  
  • What is metaphysics?Martin Heidegger - 1949 - In Martin Heidegger & Werner Brock (eds.), Existence and being. Chicago,: H. Regnery Co..
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   136 citations  
  • Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy.Martin Heidegger - 2009 - Indiana University Press.
    Volume 18 of Martin Heidegger's collected works presents his important 1924 Marburg lectures which anticipate much of the revolutionary thinking that he subsequently articulated in Being and Time. Here are the seeds of the ideas that would become Heidegger's unique phenomenology. Heidegger interprets Aristotle's Rhetoric and looks closely at the Greek notion of pathos. These lectures offer special insight into the development of his concepts of care and concern, being-at-hand, being-in-the-world, and attunement, which were later elaborated in Being and Time. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Towards a Critical Philosophy of Science: Continental Beginnings and Bugbears, Whigs, and Waterbears.Babette Babich - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):343-391.
    Continental philosophy of science has developed alongside mainstream analytic philosophy of science. But where continental approaches are inclusive, analytic philosophies of science are not–excluding not merely Nietzsche’s philosophy of science but Gödel’s philosophy of physics. As a radicalization of Kant, Nietzsche’s critical philosophy of science puts science in question and Nietzsche’s critique of the methodological foundations of classical philology bears on science, particularly evolution as well as style (in art and science). In addition to the critical (in Mach, Nietzsche, Heidegger (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations