The present volume provides an introduction to the major themes of work in experimental philosophy, bringing together some of the most influential articles in ...

This paper examines a constellation of ethical and editorial issues that have arisen since philosophers started to conduct, submit and publish empirical research. These issues encompass concerns over responsible authorship, fair treatment of human subjects, ethicality of experimental procedures, availability of data, unselective reporting and publishability of research findings. This study aims to assess whether the philosophical community has as yet successfully addressed such issues. To do so, the instructions for authors, submission process and published research papers of 29 main (...) journals in philosophy have been considered and analyzed. In light of the evidence reported here, it is argued that the philosophical community has as yet failed to properly tackle such issues. The paper also delivers some recommendations for authors, reviewers and editors in the field. (shrink)

There is growing interest in understanding and eliciting division of labor within groups of scientists. This paper illustrates the need for this division of labor through a historical example, and a formal model is presented to better analyze situations of this type. Analysis of this model reveals that a division of labor can be maintained in two different ways: by limiting information or by endowing the scientists with extreme beliefs. If both features are present however, cognitive diversity is maintained indefinitely, (...) and as a result agents fail to converge to the truth. Beyond the mechanisms for creating diversity suggested here, this shows that the real epistemic goal is not diversity but transient diversity. (shrink)

This supplement serves a double purpose. It presents, on the one hand, a selection of papers devoted to the title question “How much philosophy in the philosophy of science?”. On the other hand, it signalizes the newly established cooperation between the German Society for the Philosophy of Science and the Journal for General Philosophy of Science .The GWP was founded in Hannover in 2011 and had its inaugural conference in March 2013 [for a report on the “GWP.2013” by H. Lyre (...) see EPSA Newsletter 2 2013]. The society was launched for several reasons. Albeit the German community of philosophers of science is quite large , it is at the same time a rather distributed and dispersed community. This has to do with the university landscape in Germany, which is dispersed rather t .. (shrink)

Es soll ein Wissenschaftsbegriff begründet werden, der sowohl auf die Naturwissenschaften als auch den Komplex, den man als Geistes-, Kultur- oder Gesellschaftswissenschaft bezeichnet, also allgemein angewandt werden kann. Wesentlich ist dabei als Voraussetzung seine Freiheit gegenüber jeder Weltanschauung bzw. Metaphysik, wie auch gegenüber jeder speziellen Wissenschaft. Nach einem historischen Rekurs wird aus der Dreiheit gängiger Wissenschaftsbestimmung der "propositionale" Begriff als der sinnvollste angesehen. Dann wird versucht, den üblichen Begriff entsprechend zu erweitern . Die charakteristischen Postulate werden in einer Zusammenfassung thesenartig (...) formuliert. (shrink)