Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy.R. Björn Jensen - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (3):229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   269 citations  
  • Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals.Lon Berk Radin - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 22 (3):243.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Diamond (on the regulars) can fail at any strongly unfoldable cardinal.Mirna Džamonja & Joel David Hamkins - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):83-95.
    If κ is any strongly unfoldable cardinal, then this is preserved in a forcing extension in which κ fails. This result continues the progression of the corresponding results for weakly compact cardinals, due to Woodin, and for indescribable cardinals, due to Hauser.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Indescribable cardinals without diamonds.Kai Hauser - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (5):373-383.
    We show that form, n≧1 the existence of a∏ n m indescribable cardinal is equiconsistent with the failure of the combinatorial principle at a∏ n m indescribable cardinal κ together with the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory.Leo Harrington & Saharon Shelah - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (2):178-188.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • $\Diamond$ at mahlo cardinals.Martin Zeman - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1813 - 1822.
    Given a Mahlo cardinal κ and a regular ε such that $\omega_1 we show that $\diamond_\kappa (cf = \epsilon)$ holds in V provided that there are only non-stationarily many $\beta , with o(β) ≥ ε in K.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • ◇ at Mahlo cardinals.Martin Zeman - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1813-1822.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Reflecting stationary sets.Menachem Magidor - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):755-771.
    We prove that the statement "For every pair A, B, stationary subsets of ω 2 , composed of points of cofinality ω, there exists an ordinal α such that both A ∩ α and $B \bigcap \alpha$ are stationary subsets of α" is equiconsistent with the existence of weakly compact cardinal. (This completes results of Baumgartner and Harrington and Shelah.) We also prove, assuming the existence of infinitely many supercompact cardinals, the statement "Every stationary subset of ω ω + 1 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations