Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.
    This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It starts with the observation that logic, although very well applicable to legal reasoning when there is uncertainty, vagueness and disagreement, is too abstract to give a fully satisfactory classification of legal argument types. It therefore needs to be supplemented with an argument-scheme approach, which classifies arguments not according to their logical form but according to their content, in particular, according to the roles that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
    Argumentation mining aims to automatically detect, classify and structure argumentation in text. Therefore, argumentation mining is an important part of a complete argumentation analyisis, i.e. understanding the content of serial arguments, their linguistic structure, the relationship between the preceding and following arguments, recognizing the underlying conceptual beliefs, and understanding within the comprehensive coherence of the specific topic. We present different methods to aid argumentation mining, starting with plain argumentation detection and moving forward to a more structural analysis of the detected (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • CHIRON: Planning in an open-textured domain. [REVIEW]Kathryn E. Sanders - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):225-269.
    Planning problems arise in law when an individual (or corporation)wants to perform a sequence of actions that raises legal issues. Manylawyers make their living planning transactions, and a system thathelped them to solve these problems would be in demand.The designer of such a system in a common-law domain must addressseveral difficult issues, including the open-textured nature of legal rules,the relationship between legal rules and cases, the adversarial nature ofthe domain, and the role of argument. In addition, the system's design isconstrained (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems.T. J. M. Bench-Capon & F. P. Coenen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):65-86.
    This paper discusses some engineering considerations that should be taken into account when building a knowledge based system, and recommends isomorphism, the well defined correspondence of the knowledge base to the source texts, as a basic principle of system construction in the legal domain. Isomorphism, as it has been used in the field of legal knowledge based systems, is characterised and the benefits which stem from its use are described. Some objections to and limitations of the approach are discussed. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind.George Lakoff - 1987 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (4):299-302.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1036 citations  
  • Automated patent landscaping.Aaron Abood & Dave Feltenberger - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (2):103-125.
    Patent landscaping is the process of finding patents related to a particular topic. It is important for companies, investors, governments, and academics seeking to gauge innovation and assess risk. However, there is no broadly recognized best approach to landscaping. Frequently, patent landscaping is a bespoke human-driven process that relies heavily on complex queries over bibliographic patent databases. In this paper, we present Automated Patent Landscaping, an approach that jointly leverages human domain expertise, heuristics based on patent metadata, and machine learning (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • AI in law practice? So far, not much.Anja Oskamp & Marc Lauritsen - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):227-236.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Symbolic Logic: A Razor-edge Tool for Drafting and Interpreting Legal Documents.Layman E. Allen & Gabriel Orechkoff - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):43-44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations