- A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.details
|
|
Building a corpus of legal argumentation in Japanese judgement documents: towards structure-based summarisation.Hiroaki Yamada, Simone Teufel & Takenobu Tokunaga - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (2):141-170.details
|
|
Assessing the epistemic quality of democratic decision-making in terms of adequate support for conclusions.Henrik Friberg-Fernros & Johan Karlsson Schaffer - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):251-265.details
|
|
A Plea for Ecological Argument Technologies.Fabio Paglieri - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):209-238.details
|
|
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1):26-53.details
|
|
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.details
|
|
Classifying proportionality - identification of a legal argument.Kilian Lüders & Bent Stohlmann - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-28.details
|
|
A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.details
|
|
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games: 25 years later.Pietro Baroni, Francesca Toni & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):1-14.details
|
|
A means-end classification of argumentation schemes.Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - In Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 183-201.details
|
|
Artificial intelligence as law. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2):181-206.details
|
|
Trust, relevance, and arguments.Fabio Paglieri & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):216-236.details
|
|
Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):111-142.details
|
|
Knowledge mining and social dangerousness assessment in criminal justice: metaheuristic integration of machine learning and graph-based inference.Nicola Lettieri, Alfonso Guarino, Delfina Malandrino & Rocco Zaccagnino - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (4):653-702.details
|
|
How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):269-295.details
|
|
Mining legal arguments in court decisions.Ivan Habernal, Daniel Faber, Nicola Recchia, Sebastian Bretthauer, Iryna Gurevych, Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann & Christoph Burchard - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (3):1-38.details
|
|
On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval.Marc van Opijnen & Cristiana Santos - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):65-87.details
|
|
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.Mark Snaith, Alison Pease, John Lawrence, Barbara Konat, Mathilde Janier, Rory Duthie, Katarzyna Budzynska & Chris Reed - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):137-160.details
|
|
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade.Giovanni Sartor, Michał Araszkiewicz, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Tom van Engers, Enrico Francesconi, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sileno, Frank Schilder, Adam Wyner & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):521-557.details
|
|
Comparing decoding mechanisms for parsing argumentative structures.Stergos Afantenos, Andreas Peldszus & Manfred Stede - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (3):177-192.details
|
|
Argumentation mining: How can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge?Marie-Francine Moens - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (1):1-14.details
|
|
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: Editor’s Introduction.Trevor Bench-Capon - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):475-479.details
|
|
Legal information retrieval for understanding statutory terms.Jaromír Šavelka & Kevin D. Ashley - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (2):245-289.details
|
|
Data-centric and logic-based models for automated legal problem solving.L. Karl Branting - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):5-27.details
|
|
Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes.Nancy L. Green - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (2):121-135.details
|
|