- Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.Elisabeth Camp - 2011 - Noûs 46 (4):587 - 634.details
|
|
How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.details
|
|
Why metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics.Elisabeth Camp - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):47--64.details
|
|
Slurring Perspectives.Elisabeth Camp - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (3):330-349.details
|
|
Conventions’ Revenge: Davidson, Derangement, and Dormativity.Elisabeth Camp - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):113-138.details
|
|
Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said.Elisabeth Camp - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (3):280–309.details
|
|
Did Clinton say something false?J. M. Saul - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):255-257.details
|
|
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 2003-01-01 - In Mary Warnock (ed.), Utilitarianism and on Liberty. Blackwell. pp. 88–180.details
|
|
Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker.James J. Lee & Steven Pinker - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (3):785-807.details
|
|
How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.Sachi Kumon-Nakamura, Sam Glucksberg & Mary Brown - 1995 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (1):3.details
|
|
Incitement: A Study in Language Crime.Joseph Jaconelli - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (2):245-265.details
|
|
Footing.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Semiotica 25 (1-2):1-30.details
|
|
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.details
|
|
The logic of indirect speech.Steven Pinker - manuscriptdetails
|
|
The Reasonableness of the Reasonable Woman Standard.Linda L. Peterson - 1999 - Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (2):141-158.details
|
|