Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Ignorant armies: The state, the public, and the making of foreign policy.Earl C. Ravenal - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):327-374.
    A state's foreign policy is constrained by parameters that inhere in the structure of the international system and in the nation's own political‐constitutional, social, and economic systems. The latter, domestic parameters, include “public opinion.” Because the public is largely ignorant of foreign affairs, policy‐making elites have wide scope for acting more rationally than would otherwise be possible, although public opinion operates on the second‐order effects of foreign policy (e.g., taxes, casualties)—inviting mismatches of objectives and means. The prevalent nonrational theories of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Bringing the state back in … again.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):139-146.
    Previous scholarship on states’ autonomy from the interests of society has focused primarily on nondemocratic societies, raising the question of whether “state theory” is relevant to modern states. Public‐opinion research documenting the ignorance of mass polities suggests that modern states may be as autonomous as, or more autonomous than, premodern states. Premodern states’ autonomy was secured by their ability to suppress societal dissent by force of arms. Modern states may have less recourse to overt coercion because the very thing that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Beyond marxist state theory: State autonomy in democratic societies.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):215-236.
    Recent theories of the state often draw attention to states’ autonomy from social preferences. This paper suggests that the phenomenon of public ignorance is the primary mechanism responsible for state autonomy in democratic polities. Such theorists as Skocpol and Poulantzus, who do not take account of public ignorance, either underestimate the state's autonomy or stress causal mechanisms that are necessary but not sufficient conditions for its autonomy. Gram‐sci's concept of ideological hegemony is promising, even though it is far too insistent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • State autonomy & civil society: The lobbyist connection.Rogan Kersh - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):237-258.
    The much‐noted decline of “state autonomy” theories owes partly to external challenges to state power, such as globalization, supranational regimes, and the like. But advanced democratic states have also long been seen as threatened from within, especially by powerful private interest groups. The extent of private‐interest influence on policy making depends in important part on corporate lobbyists, a group whose activities are chronicled in this essay. Lobbyists exercise considerably more autonomy from the private clients who hire them than has previously (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations