Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
    The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"--metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1170 citations  
  • Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.Lera Boroditsky - 2000 - Cognition 75 (1):1-28.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   180 citations  
  • Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.Jill H. Larkin & Herbert A. Simon - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (1):65-100.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   179 citations  
  • Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Janellen Huttenlocher - 1968 - Psychological Review 75 (6):550-560.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations  
  • Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location.Janellen Huttenlocher, Larry V. Hedges & Susan Duncan - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (3):352-376.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   100 citations  
  • On metaphoric representation.Gregory L. Murphy - 1996 - Cognition 60 (2):173-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • Spatial representations activated during real‐time comprehension of verbs.Daniel C. Richardson, Michael J. Spivey, Lawrence W. Barsalou & Ken McRae - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (5):767-780.
    Previous research has shown that na_ve participants display a high level of agreement when asked to choose or drawschematic representations, or image schemas, of concrete and abstract verbs [Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2001, Erlbaum, Mawhah, NJ, p. 873]. For example, participants tended to ascribe a horizontal image schema to push, and a vertical image schema to respect. This consistency in offline data is preliminary evidence that language invokes spatial forms of representation. It also (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • The three-term series problem.Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1972 - Cognition 1 (1):57-82.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.L. Elizabeth Crawford, Terry Regier & Janellen Huttenlocher - 2000 - Cognition 75 (3):209-235.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Spatial categories and the estimation of location.Janellen Huttenlocher, Larry V. Hedges, Bryce Corrigan & L. Elizabeth Crawford - 2004 - Cognition 93 (2):75-97.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations