Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On the automorphism groups of finite covers.David M. Evans & Ehud Hrushovski - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 62 (2):83-112.
    We are concerned with identifying by how much a finite cover of an 0-categorical structure differs from a sequence of free covers. The main results show that this is measured by automorphism groups which are nilpotent-by-abelian. In the language of covers, these results say that every finite cover can be decomposed naturally into linked, superlinked and free covers. The superlinked covers arise from covers over a different base, and to describe this properly we introduce the notion of a quasi-cover.These results (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Generic expansions by a reduct.Christian D’Elbée - 2021 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (3):2150016.
    Consider the expansion TS of a theory T by a predicate for a submodel of a reduct T0 of T. We present a setup in which this expansion admits a model companion TS. We show that some of the nice feat...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Forking and Dividing in Henson Graphs.Gabriel Conant - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (4):555-566.
    For n≥3, define Tn to be the theory of the generic Kn-free graph, where Kn is the complete graph on n vertices. We prove a graph-theoretic characterization of dividing in Tn and use it to show that forking and dividing are the same for complete types. We then give an example of a forking and nondividing formula. Altogether, Tn provides a counterexample to a question of Chernikov and Kaplan.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On model-theoretic tree properties.Artem Chernikov & Nicholas Ramsey - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (2):1650009.
    We study model theoretic tree properties and their associated cardinal invariants. In particular, we obtain a quantitative refinement of Shelah’s theorem for countable theories, show that [Formula: see text] is always witnessed by a formula in a single variable and that weak [Formula: see text] is equivalent to [Formula: see text]. Besides, we give a characterization of [Formula: see text] via a version of independent amalgamation of types and apply this criterion to verify that some examples in the literature are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.
    We prove that in theories without the tree property of the second kind (which include dependent and simple theories) forking and dividing over models are the same, and in fact over any extension base. As an application we show that dependence is equivalent to bounded non-forking assuming NTP 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Model theory of finite fields and pseudo-finite fields.Zoé Chatzidakis - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):95-108.
    We give a survey of results obtained in the model theory of finite and pseudo-finite fields.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Generic structures and simple theories.Z. Chatzidakis & A. Pillay - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 95 (1-3):71-92.
    We study structures equipped with generic predicates and/or automorphisms, and show that in many cases we obtain simple theories. We also show that a bounded PAC field is simple. 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • Un critère simple.Thomas Blossier & Amador Martin-Pizarro - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (4):639-663.
    Nous isolons des propriétés valables dans certaines théories de purs corps ou de corps munis d’opérateurs afin de montrer qu’une théorie est simple lorsque les clôtures définissables et algébriques sont contrôlées par une théorie stable associée.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Model theory of Steiner triple systems.Silvia Barbina & Enrique Casanovas - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (2):2050010.
    A Steiner triple system (STS) is a set S together with a collection B of subsets of S of size 3 such that any two elements of S belong to exactly one element of B. It is well known that the class of finite STS has a Fraïssé limit M_F. Here, we show that the theory T of M_F is the model completion of the theory of STSs. We also prove that T is not small and it has quantifier elimination, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Notions around tree property 1.Byunghan Kim & Hyeung-Joon Kim - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (9):698-709.
    In this paper, we study the notions related to tree property 1 , or, equivalently, SOP2. Among others, we supply a type-counting criterion for TP1 and show the equivalence of TP1 and k- TP1. Then we introduce the notions of weak k- TP1 for k≥2, and also supply type-counting criteria for those. We do not know whether weak k- TP1 implies TP1, but at least we prove that each weak k- TP1 implies SOP1. Our generalization of the tree-indiscernibility results in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Properties of forking in {$ømega$}-free pseudo-algebraically closed fields.Zoé Chatzidakis - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):957-996.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • A geometric introduction to forking and thorn-forking.Hans Adler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):1-20.
    A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of axioms. The primary example is forking in a simple theory, but o-minimal theories are also known to have an interesting independence relation. Our approach in this paper is to treat independence relations as mathematical objects worth studying. The main application is a better understanding of thorn-forking, which turns out to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Thorn-forking as local forking.Hans Adler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):21-38.
    A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of axioms. The primary example is forking in a simple theory, but o-minimal theories are also known to have an interesting independence relation. Our approach in this paper is to treat independence relations as mathematical objects worth studying. The main application is a better understanding of thorn-forking, which turns out to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Generic expansion and Skolemization in NSOP 1 theories.Alex Kruckman & Nicholas Ramsey - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (8):755-774.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Simple theories.Byunghan Kim & Anand Pillay - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):149-164.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   102 citations