Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Coordinating with each other in a material world.Herbert H. Clark - 2005 - Discourse Studies 7 (4-5):507-525.
    In everyday joint activities, people coordinate with each other by means not only of linguistic signals, but also of material signals – signals in which they indicate things by deploying material objects, locations, or actions around them. Material signals fall into two main classes: directing-to and placing-for. In directing-to, people request addressees to direct their attention to objects, events, or themselves. In placing-for, people place objects, actions, or themselves in special sites for addressees to interpret. Both classes have many subtypes. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.Cordula Vesper, Ekaterina Abramova, Judith Bütepage, Francesca Ciardo, Benjamin Crossey, Alfred Effenberg, Dayana Hristova, April Karlinsky, Luke McEllin, Sari R. R. Nijssen, Laura Schmitz & Basil Wahn - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Learning rapid and precise skills.John R. Anderson, Shawn Betts, Daniel Bothell, Ryan Hope & Christian Lebiere - 2019 - Psychological Review 126 (5):727-760.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Plateaus, Dips, and Leaps: Where to Look for Inventions and Discoveries During Skilled Performance.Wayne D. Gray & John K. Lindstedt - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (7):1838-1870.
    The framework of plateaus, dips, and leaps shines light on periods when individuals may be inventing new methods of skilled performance. We begin with a review of the role performance plateaus have played in experimental psychology, human–computer interaction, and cognitive science. We then reanalyze two classic studies of individual performance to show plateaus and dips which resulted in performance leaps. For a third study, we show how the statistical methods of Changepoint Analysis plus a few simple heuristics may direct our (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback.Niels A. Taatgen & John R. Anderson - 2002 - Cognition 86 (2):123-155.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • (1 other version)Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where.Natalie Sebanz & Guenther Knoblich - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):353-367.
    Drawing on recent findings in the cognitive and neurosciences, this article discusses how people manage to predict each other’s actions, which is fundamental for joint action. We explore how a common coding of perceived and performed actions may allow actors to predict the what, when, and where of others’ actions. The “what” aspect refers to predictions about the kind of action the other will perform and to the intention that drives the action. The “when” aspect is critical for all joint (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Contributing to Discourse.Herbert H. Clark & Edward F. Schaefer - 1989 - Cognitive Science 13 (2):259-294.
    For people to contribute to discourse, they must do more than utter the right sentence at the right time. The basic requirement is that they add to their common ground in an orderly way. To do this, we argue, they try to establish for each utterance the mutual belief that the addressees have understood what the speaker meant well enough for current purposes. This is accomplished by the collective actions of the current contributor and his or her partners, and these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Shared Representations as Coordination Tools for Interaction.Giovanni Pezzulo - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):303-333.
    Why is interaction so simple? This article presents a theory of interaction based on the use of shared representations as “coordination tools” (e.g., roundabouts that facilitate coordination of drivers). By aligning their representations (intentionally or unintentionally), interacting agents help one another to solve interaction problems in that they remain predictable, and offer cues for action selection and goal monitoring. We illustrate how this strategy works in a joint task (building together a tower of bricks) and discuss its requirements from a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination.Cordula Vesper, Laura Schmitz, Lou Safra, Natalie Sebanz & Günther Knoblich - 2016 - Cognition 153 (C):118-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical.Shravan Vasishth, Sven Brüssow, Richard L. Lewis & Heiner Drenhaus - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (4):685-712.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Cognitive niches: An ecological model of strategy selection.Julian N. Marewski & Lael J. Schooler - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (3):393-437.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations