Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
    This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1724 citations  
  • The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures.Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin & Daniel J. Simons - 2003 - Perception 32 (8):947-962.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The siren song of implicit change detection.Stephen R. Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons & Steven Franconeri - 2002 - Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance 28 (4):798-815.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
    The thirty-five chapters in this book describe various judgmental heuristics and the biases they produce, not only in laboratory experiments but in important...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1234 citations  
  • The Dirt on Coming Clean.Daylian M. Cain, George Loewenstein & Don A. Moore - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:81-99.
    Conflicts of interest can lead experts to give biased and corrupt advice. Although disclosure is often proposed as a potential solution to these problems, we show that it can have perverse effects. First, people generally do not discount advice from biased advisors as much as they should, even when advisors’ conflicts of interest are disclosed. Second, disclosure can increase the bias in advice because it leads advisors to feel morally licensed and strategically encouraged to exaggerate their advice even further. As (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
    People often fail to detect large changes to scenes, provided that the changes occur during a visual disruption. This phenomenon, known as ''change blindness,'' occurs both in the laboratory and in real-world situations in which changes occur unexpectedly. The pervasiveness of the inability to detect changes is consistent with the theoretical notion that we internally represent relatively little information from our visual world from one glance at a scene to the next. However, evidence for change blindness does not necessarily imply (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.Daniel J. Simons & Christopher F. Chabris - 1999 - Perception 28 (9):1059-1074.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   227 citations  
  • Conflicts of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy.Don A. Moore (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This collection explores the subject of conflicts of interest. It investigates how to manage conflicts of interest, how they can affect well-meaning professionals, and how they can limit the effectiveness of corporate boards, undermine professional ethics, and corrupt expert opinion. Legal and policy responses are considered, some of which (e.g., disclosure) are shown to backfire and even fail. The results offer a sobering prognosis for professional ethics and for anyone who relies on professionals who have conflicts of interest. The contributors (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest.Dolly Chugh, Max H. Bazerman & Mahzarin R. Banaji - 2005 - In Don A. Moore (ed.), Conflicts of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • Current approaches to change blindness.Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:1-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • Inattentional Blindness.Arien Mack & Irvin Rock - 1998 - MIT Press. Edited by Richard D. Wright.
    Arien Mack and Irvin Rock make the radical claim that there is no conscious perception of the visual world without attention to it.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   235 citations  
  • Reason in Human Affairs.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    What can reason do for us and what can't it do? This is the question examined by Herbert A. Simon, who received the 1978 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences "for his pioneering work on decision-making processes in economic organizations." The ability to apply reason to the choice of actions is supposed to be one of the defining characteristics of our species. In the first two chapters, the author explores the nature and limits of human reason, comparing and evaluating the major (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  • Inattentional blindness: An overview.Arien Mack & Irvin Rock - 2003 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 12 (5):180-184.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability.Amos Tversky & Derek J. Koehler - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (4):547-567.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations