Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Sense of Beauty.G. Santayana - 1897 - Philosophical Review 6:210.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Formal Qualities in the Natural Environment.Allen Carlson - 1979 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 13 (3):99.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Autographic and allographic art revisited.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (4):367 - 383.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Feasible aesthetic formalism.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
    Aesthetic Formalism has fallen on hard times. At best it receives unsympathetic discussion and swift rejection. At worst it is the object of abuse and derision. But I think that there is something to be said for it. In this paper, I shall try to find and secure the truth in formalism. I shall not try to defend formalism against all of the objections to it.1 Instead I shall articulate a moderate formalist view that draws on aesthetic0nonaesthetic determination and Kant’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • The Principles of Art.R. G. Collingwood - 1938 - Philosophy 13 (52):492-496.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   158 citations  
  • Greater Perfections: The Practice of Garden Theory.John Dixon Hunt - 2001 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (3):341-343.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Meaninglessness of Gardens.G. R. F. Ferrari - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):33-45.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • In praise of gardens.David E. Cooper - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):101-113.
    The paper asks whether gardens may be objects of ‘serious’ (in Ronald Hepburn's sense) and distinctive appreciation. Dismissive attitudes to the possibility of such appreciation, including Hegel's, are rejected, as is the view—Kant's, for example—that garden appreciation is ‘factorizable’ into the modes appropriate for artworks and ‘raw’ nature respectively. That view entails that there is nothing distinctive in garden appreciation. Attention then turns to the idea that it is the representational/symbolic capacities of gardens that render them objects of distinctive appreciation. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Environmental Aesthetics and the Dynamic Object.David E. W. Fenner - 2006 - Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):1-20.
    In this paper, I lay out a case for why those objects of aesthetic attention which are principally characterized as natural objects should be understood not statically, as existing in merely a three-dimensional fixed state, but as dynamic, as existing in a space-time context, complete with change, movement, and flux. After this, I explain why this is important, how the dynamic nature of natural objects raises a concern for aesthetically evaluating natural objects, and how that concern may be addressed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Appreciation and the natural environment.Allen Carlson - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (3):267-275.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • Feeling and Form. By Susanne K. langer, Visiting Professor at the University of Washington. (Routledge and Kegan Paul. Pp. xvi + 431. With 6 plates. Price 28s.). [REVIEW]E. F. Carritt - 1955 - Philosophy 30 (112):75-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations