Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Introduction to axiomatic set theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1971 - New York,: Springer Verlag. Edited by Wilson M. Zaring.
    In 1963, the first author introduced a course in set theory at the University of Illinois whose main objectives were to cover Godel's work on the con sistency of the Axiom of Choice (AC) and the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis (GCH), and Cohen's work on the independence of the AC and the GCH. Notes taken in 1963 by the second author were taught by him in 1966, revised extensively, and are presented here as an introduction to axiomatic set theory. Texts in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Toward a Theory of Second-Order Consequence.Augustín Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):315-325.
    There is little doubt that a second-order axiomatization of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice (ZFC) is desirable. One advantage of such an axiomatization is that it permits us to express the principles underlying the first-order schemata of separation and replacement. Another is its almost-categoricity: M is a model of second-order ZFC if and only if it is isomorphic to a model of the form Vκ, ∈ ∩ (Vκ × Vκ) , for κ a strongly inaccessible ordinal.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Generalized Löb’s Theorem. Strong Reflection Principles and Large Cardinal Axioms.Jaykov Foukzon - 2013 - Advances in Pure Mathematics (3):368-373.
    In this article, a possible generalization of the Löb’s theorem is considered. Main result is: let κ be an inaccessible cardinal, then ¬Con( ZFC +∃κ) .
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • First-order logic, second-order logic, and completeness.Marcus Rossberg - 2004 - In Vincent F. Hendricks (ed.), First-order logic revisited. Berlin: Logos. pp. 303-321.
    This paper investigates the claim that the second-order consequence relation is intractable because of the incompleteness result for SOL. The opponents’ claim is that SOL cannot be proper logic since it does not have a complete deductive system. I argue that the lack of a completeness theorem, despite being an interesting result, cannot be held against the status of SOL as a proper logic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Foundations without foundationalism: a case for second-order logic.Stewart Shapiro - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    The central contention of this book is that second-order logic has a central role to play in laying the foundations of mathematics. In order to develop the argument fully, the author presents a detailed description of higher-order logic, including a comprehensive discussion of its semantics. He goes on to demonstrate the prevalence of second-order concepts in mathematics and the extent to which mathematical ideas can be formulated in higher-order logic. He also shows how first-order languages are often insufficient to codify (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   231 citations  
  • (1 other version)Completeness in the theory of types.Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):81-91.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   202 citations  
  • Warning signs of a possible collapse of contemporary mathematics.Edward Nelson - 2011 - In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: new research frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 76.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations