Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality.Karl R. Popper - 1994 - In Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. Routledge. pp. 33-64.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • Situational determinism in economics.Spiro J. Latsis - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):207-245.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Does rationality give us reasons?John Broome - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):321–337.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   105 citations  
  • Practical reasoning and acceptance in a context.Michael E. Bratman - 1992 - Mind 101 (401):1-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   203 citations  
  • The Self and its brain.K. Popper & J. Eccles - 1986 - Revista de filosofía (Chile) 27:167-171.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   510 citations  
  • Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction.M. A. Notturno (ed.) - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
    First published in 1994. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Imperfect rationality.J. W. N. Watkins - 1970 - In Robert Borger (ed.), Explanation In The Behavioural Sciences. Cambridge University Press. pp. 147--237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence.David W. Miller - 1994 - Open Court.
    David Miller elegantly and provocatively reformulates critical rationalism—the revolutionary approach to epistemology advocated by Karl Popper—by answering its most important critics. He argues for an approach to rationality freed from the debilitating authoritarian dependence on reasons and justification. "Miller presents a particularly useful and stimulating account of critical rationalism. His work is both interesting and controversial... of interest to anyone with concerns in epistemology or the philosophy of science." —Canadian Philosophical Reviews.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations  
  • 60% Proof Lakatos, Proof, and Paraconsistency.Graham Priest & Neil Thomason - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Logic 5:89-100.
    Imre Lakatos’ Proofs and Refutations is a book well known to those who work in the philosophy of mathematics, though it is perhaps not widely referred to. Its general thrust is out of tenor with the foundationalist perspective that has dominated work in the philosophy of mathematics since the early years of the 20th century. It seems to us, though, that the book contains striking insights into the nature of proof, and the purpose of this paper is to explore and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Against Method.Mark Wilson - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (1):106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   133 citations  
  • Conjectural Knowledge My Solution of the Problem of Induction.Karl Raimund Popper - 1971 - [S.N.].
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Karl Popper and the Social Sciences.William A. Gorton - 2006 - State University of New York Press.
    The first systematic treatment of Karl Popper’s contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Popper and Free Will.Danny Frederick - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 3 (1):21-38.
    Determinism seems incompatible with free will. However, even indeterminism seems incompatible with free will, since it seems to make free actions random. Popper contends that free agents are not bound by physical laws, even indeterministic ones, and that undetermined actions are not random if they are influenced by abstract entities. I argue that Popper could strengthen his account by drawing upon his theories of propensities and of limited rationality; but that even then his account would not fully explain why free (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations