Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
    Talk of linguistic universals has given cognitive scientists the impression that languages are all built to a common pattern. In fact, there are vanishingly few universals of language in the direct sense that all languages exhibit them. Instead, diversity can be found at almost every level of linguistic organization. This fundamentally changes the object of enquiry from a cognitive science perspective. This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and descriptive linguists, showing just how few and unprofound the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   183 citations  
  • The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114.
    Miller (1956) summarized evidence that people can remember about seven chunks in short-term memory (STM) tasks. However, that number was meant more as a rough estimate and a rhetorical device than as a real capacity limit. Others have since suggested that there is a more precise capacity limit, but that it is only three to five chunks. The present target article brings together a wide variety of data on capacity limits suggesting that the smaller capacity limit is real. Capacity limits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   403 citations  
  • (1 other version)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.George A. Miller - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (2):81-97.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   928 citations  
  • Précis of foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution,.Ray Jackendoff - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):651-665.
    The goal of this study is to reintegrate the theory of generative grammar into the cognitive sciences. Generative grammar was right to focus on the child's acquisition of language as its central problem, leading to the hypothesis of an innate Universal Grammar. However, generative grammar was mistaken in assuming that the syntactic component is the sole course of combinatoriality, and that everything else is “interpretive.” The proper approach is a parallel architecture, in which phonology, syntax, and semantics are autonomous generative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Linguistic structure and short term memory.Emmanuel M. Pothos & Patrick Juola - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):138-139.
    We provide additional support for Cowan's claim that short term memory (STM) involves a range of 3–5 tokens, on the basis of language correlational analyses. If language is at least partly learned, linguistic dependency structure should reflect properties of the cognitive components mediating learning; one such component is STM. In this view, the range over which statistical regularity extends in ordinary text would be suggestive of STM span. Our analyses of eight languages are consistent with STM span being about four (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries.Martin Haspelmath - 2008 - Cognitive Linguistics 19 (1):1-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations