Switch to: Citations

References in:

Small sets

Philosophical Studies 63 (1):119 - 123 (1991)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Foundations of Set Theory.A. A. Fraenkel, Y. Bar Hillel & A. Levy - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):165-170.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Foundations of Set Theory.Abraham Adolf Fraenkel & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1973 - Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA: Elsevier.
    Foundations of Set Theory discusses the reconstruction undergone by set theory in the hands of Brouwer, Russell, and Zermelo. Only in the axiomatic foundations, however, have there been such extensive, almost revolutionary, developments. This book tries to avoid a detailed discussion of those topics which would have required heavy technical machinery, while describing the major results obtained in their treatment if these results could be stated in relatively non-technical terms. This book comprises five chapters and begins with a discussion of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   104 citations  
  • Set Theory and its Logic: Revised Edition.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1963 - Harvard University Press.
    This is an extensively revised edition of Mr. Quine's introduction to abstract set theory and to various axiomatic systematizations of the subject.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   115 citations  
  • The iterative conception of set.George Boolos - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   195 citations  
  • Set Theory and Its Logic.Joseph S. Ullian & Willard Van Orman Quine - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):383.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Non-Well-Founded Sets.Peter Aczel - 1988 - Palo Alto, CA, USA: Csli Lecture Notes.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • The Elusiveness of Sets.Max Black - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):614-636.
    NOWADAYS, even schoolchildren babble about "null sets" and "singletons" and "one-one correspondences," as if they knew what they were talking about. But if they understand even less than their teachers, which seems likely, they must be using the technical jargon with only an illusion of understanding. Beginners are taught that a set having three members is a single thing, wholly constituted by its members but distinct from them. After this, the theological doctrine of the Trinity as "three in one" should (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations