Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Relativism and the Sociology of Mathematics: Remarks on Bloor, Flew, and Frege.Timm Triplett - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):439-450.
    Antony Flew's ?A Strong Programme for the Sociology of Belief (Inquiry 25 {1982], 365?78) critically assesses the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge defended in David Bloor's Knowledge and Social Imagery. I argue that Flew's rejection of the epistemological relativism evident in Bloor's work begs the question against the relativist and ignores Bloor's focus on the social relativity of mathematical knowledge. Bloor attempts to establish such relativity via a sociological analysis of Frege's theory of number. But this analysis only (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Knowledge and social imagery.David Bloor - 1976 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    The first edition of this book profoundly challenged and divided students of philosophy, sociology, and the history of science when it was published in 1976. In this second edition, Bloor responds in a substantial new Afterword to the heated debates engendered by his book.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   458 citations  
  • Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics.David Bloor - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (2):173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Truth, rationality and the sociology of science.Richard C. Jennings - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):201-211.
    Philosophers of science are becoming more sensitive to the claims about truth and rationality being made by sociologists of science. There is a tendency among some of these philosophers to dismiss such claims as irrelevant to philosophy of science and as self-refuting. Larry Laudan, in his 'arationality assumption', has captured the essence of positions which argue that sociology of science can only be concerned with scientific claims which are not rational (or, in some versions, 'not true'). I show that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations