Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   327 citations  
  • Indescribable cardinals and elementary embeddings.Kai Hauser - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):439-457.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Square in core models.Ernest Schimmerling & Martin Zeman - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):305-314.
    We prove that in all Mitchell-Steel core models, □ κ holds for all κ. (See Theorem 2.). From this we obtain new consistency strength lower bounds for the failure of □ κ if κ is either singular and countably closed, weakly compact, or measurable. (Corallaries 5, 8, and 9.) Jensen introduced a large cardinal property that we call subcompactness; it lies between superstrength and supercompactness in the large cardinal hierarchy. We prove that in all Jensen core models, □ κ holds (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Reflecting stationary sets.Menachem Magidor - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):755-771.
    We prove that the statement "For every pair A, B, stationary subsets of ω 2 , composed of points of cofinality ω, there exists an ordinal α such that both A ∩ α and $B \bigcap \alpha$ are stationary subsets of α" is equiconsistent with the existence of weakly compact cardinal. (This completes results of Baumgartner and Harrington and Shelah.) We also prove, assuming the existence of infinitely many supercompact cardinals, the statement "Every stationary subset of ω ω + 1 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals.Saharon Shelah - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (1):25-53.
    REF is the statement that every stationary subset of a cardinal reflects, unless it fails to do so for a trivial reason. The main theorem, presented in Sect. 0, is that under suitable assumptions it is consistent that REF and there is a κ which is κ+n -supercompact. The main concepts defined in Sect. 1 are PT, which is a certain statement about the existence of transversals, and the “bad” stationary set. It is shown that supercompactness (and even the failure (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations