Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt & Brian A. Nosek - 2009 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5):1029-1046.
    How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory, the authors developed several ways to measure people’s use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally. This difference was observed in abstract assessments of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   268 citations  
  • Mapping the moral domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.
    The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   220 citations  
  • Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues.Jonathan Haidt & Craig Joseph - 2004 - Daedalus 133 (4):55-66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   226 citations  
  • Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task.Laura Elenbaas, Michael T. Rizzo, Shelby Cooley & Melanie Killen - 2016 - Cognition 155 (C):176-187.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Evaluations Versus Expectations: Children's Divergent Beliefs About Resource Distribution.Jasmine M. DeJesus, Marjorie Rhodes & Katherine D. Kinzler - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (1):178-193.
    Past research reveals a tension between children's preferences for egalitarianism and ingroup favoritism when distributing resources to others. Here we investigate how children's evaluations and expectations of others' behaviors compare. Four- to 10-year-old children viewed events where individuals from two different groups distributed resources to their own group, to the other group, or equally across groups. Groups were described within a context of intergroup competition over scarce resources. In the Evaluation condition, children were asked to evaluate which resource distribution actions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity.Peter R. Blake & Katherine McAuliffe - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):215-224.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Foundations of cooperation in young children.Kristina R. Olson & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2008 - Cognition 108 (1):222-231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • The native language of social cognition.Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
    What leads humans to divide the social world into groups, preferring their own group and disfavoring others? Experiments with infants and young children suggest these tendencies are based on predispo- sitions that emerge early in life and depend, in part, on natural language. Young infants prefer to look at a person who previously spoke their native language. Older infants preferentially accept toys from native-language speakers, and preschool children preferentially select native-language speakers as friends. Variations in accent are sufficient to evoke (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants.Marco F. H. Schmidt & Jessica A. Sommerville - 2011 - PLoS ONE 6 (10):e23223.
    Human cooperation is a key driving force behind the evolutionary success of our hominin lineage. At the proximate level, biologists and social scientists have identified other-regarding preferences – such as fairness based on egalitarian motives, and altruism – as likely candidates for fostering large-scale cooperation. A critical question concerns the ontogenetic origins of these constituents of cooperative behavior, as well as whether they emerge independently or in an interrelated fashion. The answer to this question will shed light on the interdisciplinary (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations