Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   286 citations  
  • Discovering Complexity.William Bechtel, Robert C. Richardson & Scott A. Kleiner - 1996 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18 (3):363-382.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   147 citations  
  • Model Organisms and Mathematical and Synthetic Models to Explore Gene Regulation Mechanisms.Andrea Loettgers - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (2):134-142.
    Gene regulatory networks are intensively studied in biology. One of the main aims of these studies is to gain an understanding of how the structure of genetic networks relates to specific functions such as chemotaxis and the circadian clock. Scientists have examined this question by using model organisms such as Drosophila and mathematical models. In the last years, synthetic models—engineered genetic networks—have become more and more important in the exploration of gene regulation. What is the potential of this new approach (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • (1 other version)Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   375 citations  
  • Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: piecewise approximations to reality.William C. Wimsatt - 2007 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    This book offers a philosophy for error-prone humans trying to understand messy systems in the real world.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   394 citations  
  • Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism.Sandra D. Mitchell - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    This fine collection of essays by a leading philosopher of science presents a defence of integrative pluralism as the best description for the complexity of scientific inquiry today. The tendency of some scientists to unify science by reducing all theories to a few fundamental laws of the most basic particles that populate our universe is ill-suited to the biological sciences, which study multi-component, multi-level, evolved complex systems. This integrative pluralism is the most efficient way to understand the different and complex (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   172 citations  
  • (1 other version)Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1966 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (3):190-191.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   422 citations