Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice.Iris Marion Young - unknown
    This is the text of The Lindley Lecture for 2003, given by Iris Marion Young, an American philosopher.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • What Does Public Health Ethics Tell (Or Not Tell) Us About Intervening in Non-Communicable Diseases?Ross Upshur - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):19-28.
    Obesity has been described as pandemic and a public health crisis. It has been argued that concerted research efforts are needed to enhance our understanding and develop effective interventions for the complex and multiple dimensions of the health challenges posed by obesity. This would provide a secure evidence base in order to justify clinical interventions and public policy. This paper critically examines these claims through the examination of models of public health and public health ethics. I argue that the concept (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Tackling the Global NCD Crisis: Innovations in Law and Governance.Bryan Thomas & Lawrence O. Gostin - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):16-27.
    To someone holding a hammer, the cliché goes, everything looks like a nail. A similar myopia often afflicts legal minds as they approach deep-seated problems in global health, as every crisis is approached by first asking how it might be litigated away. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the limits of litigation as a tool for advancing equitable access to health — indeed of its potential, under some circumstances, to have a positively regressive impact. This very (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Chronic disease as risk multiplier for disadvantage.Francisca Stutzin Donoso - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):371-375.
    This paper starts by establishing a prima facie case that disadvantaged groups or individuals are more likely to get a chronic disease and are in a disadvantaged position to adhere to chronic treatment despite access through Universal Health Coverage. However, the main aim of this paper is to explore the normative implications of this claim by examining two different but intertwined argumentative lines that might contribute to a better understanding of the ethical challenges faced by chronic disease health policy. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach.A. W. Cappelen & O. F. Norheim - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):476-480.
    Lifestyle diseases constitute an increasing proportion of health problems and this trend is likely to continue. A better understanding of the responsibility argument is important for the assessment of policies aimed at meeting this challenge. Holding individuals accountable for their choices in the context of health care is, however, controversial. There are powerful arguments both for and against such policies. In this article the main arguments for and the traditional arguments against the use of individual responsibility as a criterion for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability – a way forward.Florencia Luna - 2018 - Developing World Bioethics 19 (2):86-95.
    “Vulnerability” is a key concept for research ethics and public health ethics. This term can be discussed from either a conceptual or a practical perspective. I previously proposed the metaphor of layers to understand how this concept functions from the conceptual perspective in human research. In this paper I will clarify how my analysis includes other definitions of vulnerability. Then, I will take the practical‐ethical perspective, rejecting the usefulness of taxonomies to analyze vulnerabilities. My proposal specifies two steps and provides (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Appeal to the Rule of Rescue in health care: discriminating and not benevolent?Weyma Lübbe - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):53-58.
    Thirty years of debate have passed since the term “Rule of Rescue” has been introduced into medical ethics. Its main focus was on whether or why medical treatment for acute conditions should have priority over preventive measures irrespective of opportunity costs. Recent contributions, taking account of the widespread reluctance to accept purely efficiency-oriented prioritization approaches, advance another objection: Prioritizing treatment, they hold, discriminates against statistical lives. The reference to opportunity costs has also been renewed in a distinctly ethical fashion: It (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations