Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility.Michelle Greenwood - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):315-327.
    The purpose of this article is to transcend the assumption that stakeholder engagement is necessarily a responsible practice. Stakeholder engagement is traditionally seen as corporate responsibility in action. Indeed, in some literatures there exists an assumption that the more an organisation engages with its stakeholders, the more it is responsible. This simple 'more is better' view of stakeholder engagement belies the true complexity of the relationship between engagement and corporate responsibility. Stakeholder engagement may be understood in a variety of different (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • Managing for Stakeholders: Trade-offs or Value Creation. [REVIEW]R. Edward Freeman - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):7-9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • The Meaning and Meaningfulness of Corporate Social Initiatives.Danielle E. Warren David Hess - 2008 - Business and Society Review 113 (2):163-197.
    In response to pressures to be more “socially responsible,” corporations are becoming more active in global communities through direct involvement in social initiatives. Critics, however, question the sincerity of these activities and argue that firms are simply attempting to stave off stakeholder pressures without providing a corresponding benefit to society. By drawing on institutional theory and resource dependence theory, we consider what factors influence the adoption of a “meaningful” social initiative—an initiative that is sustainable and has the potential for a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment.Jane Collier & Rafael Esteban - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (1):19–33.
    Effective corporate social responsibility policies are a requirement for today's companies. Policies have not only to be formulated, they also have to be delivered by corporate employees. This paper uses existing research findings to identify two types of factors that may impact on employee motivation and commitment to CSR ‘buy-in’. The first of these is contextual: employee attitudes and behaviours will be affected by organizational culture and climate, by whether CSR policies are couched in terms of compliance or in terms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • A Dynamic Perspective in Freeman’s Stakeholder Model.Yves Fassin - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):39-49.
    Stakeholder literature has acknowledged the need to complement the extant theory on stakeholder management by more dynamic perspectives. This article makes use of the recent terminology of stakewatcher and stakeseeker to illustrate the dynamic aspect of stakeholder theory transposed in the graphical representation of Freeman’s stakeholder model. Presenting a few selected case studies, it applies the scheme on the concept of value responsibility chain; it exemplifies the role of stakeseekers in various forms of activism, from shareholders, NGOs and government, in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Editorial: A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue.André Nijhof & Ronald Jeurissen - 2006 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 15 (4):316–322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)Hierarchical control or individuals' moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics.Patrick Maclagan - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (1):48–61.
    There is a fundamental tension in business ethics between the apparent need to ensure ethical conduct through hierarchical control, and the encouragement of individuals' potential for autonomous moral judgement. In philosophical terms, these positions are consequentialist and Kantian, respectively. This paper assumes the former to be the dominant position in practice, and probably in theory also, but regards it as a misplaced extension of the more general managerial tendency to seek and maintain control over employees. While the functions of such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The limits of shareholder value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
    Shareholder value orientation has been introduced as a means to improve the performance of the corporation. The paper investigates the theoretical justification for the claim that increasing shareholder value is the purpose of corporate governance. It demonstrates that shareholder value is the control principle, not the purpose of the firm. The idea that shareholder value is the only goal of the corporation is a mistaken transfer from the financial to the industrial firm. The paper also questions that the merger of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment.Jane Collier & Rafael Esteban - 2007 - Business Ethics 16 (1):19-33.
    Effective corporate social responsibility policies are a requirement for today's companies. Policies have not only to be formulated, they also have to be delivered by corporate employees. This paper uses existing research findings to identify two types of factors that may impact on employee motivation and commitment to CSR ‘buy-in’. The first of these is contextual: employee attitudes and behaviours will be affected by organizational culture and climate, by whether CSR policies are couched in terms of compliance or in terms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • Do Employees Care About CSR Programs? A Typology of Employees According to their Attitudes.Pablo Rodrigo & Daniel Arenas - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):265-283.
    This paper examines employees’ reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility programs at the attitudinal level. The results presented are drawn from an in-depth study of two Chilean construction firms that have well-established CSR programs. Grounded theory was applied to the data prior to the construction of the conceptual framework. The analysis shows that the implementation of CSR programs generates two types of attitudes in employees: attitudes toward the organization and attitudes toward society. These two broad types of attitudes can then be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • The responsible self.Helmut Richard Niebuhr - 1963 - New York,: Harper & Row.
    He finds the key in the concept of responsibility, which implies not only the freedom and flexibility of responsiveness to others but also a guiding ideal of ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • The Responsible Self: An Essay in Christian Moral Philosophy.H. Richard Niebuhr & James M. Gustafson - 1999 - Westminster John Knox Press.
    The Responsible Self was H. Richard Niebuhr's most important work in Christian ethics. In it he probes the most fundamental character of the moral life and it stands today as a landmark contribution to the field. The Library of Theological Ethics series focuses on what it means to think theologically and ethically. It presents a selection of important and otherwise unavailable texts in easily accessible form. Volumes in this series will enable sustained dialogue with predecessors though reflection on classic works (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Editorial: A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: introduction to the special issue.André Nijhof & Ronald Jeurissen - 2006 - Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4):316-322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)Editorial introduction: where is business ethics?Armin Beverungen & Peter Case - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (3):229-232.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Editorial introduction: where is business ethics?Armin Beverungen & Peter Case - 2011 - Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (3):229-232.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Hierarchical control or individuals' moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics.Patrick Maclagan - 2007 - Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (1):48-61.
    There is a fundamental tension in business ethics between the apparent need to ensure ethical conduct through hierarchical control, and the encouragement of individuals' potential for autonomous moral judgement. In philosophical terms, these positions are consequentialist and Kantian, respectively. This paper assumes the former to be the dominant position in practice, and probably in theory also, but regards it as a misplaced extension of the more general managerial tendency to seek and maintain control over employees. While the functions of such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Morals or Economics? Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility.Henry L. Petersen & Harrie Vredenburg - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):1-14.
    This article presents the results of a study that analysed whether social responsibility had any bearing on the decision making of institutional investors. Being that institutional investors prefer socially aligned organizations, this study explored to what extent the corporate actions and/or social/environmental investments influenced their decisions. Our results suggest that there are specific variables that affect the perceived value of the organization, leading to decisions to not only invest, but whether to hold or sell the shares, and therefore having a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations