Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.Robyn M. Dawes - 1979 - American Psychologist 34 (7):571-582.
    Proper linear models are those in which predictor variables are given weights such that the resulting linear composite optimally predicts some criterion of interest; examples of proper linear models are standard regression analysis, discriminant function analysis, and ridge regression analysis. Research summarized in P. Meehl's book on clinical vs statistical prediction and research stimulated in part by that book indicate that when a numerical criterion variable is to be predicted from numerical predictor variables, proper linear models outperform clinical intuition. Improper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   77 citations  
  • Theory and Evidence.Clark N. Glymour - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
    The Description for this book, Theory and Evidence, will be forthcoming.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   371 citations  
  • Specific etiology and other forms of strong influence: Some quantitative meanings.Paul E. Meehl - 1977 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2 (1):33-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge.Clarence Irving Lewis - 1956 - New York,: Dover Publications.
    Theory of "conceptual pragmatism" takes into account both modern philosophical thought and modern mathematics. Stimulating discussions of metaphysics, a priori, philosophic method, much more.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   123 citations  
  • (3 other versions)How to make our ideas clear.C. S. Peirce - 1878 - Popular Science Monthly 12 (Jan.):286-302.
    This is one of the seminal articles of the pragmatist tradition where C.S. Peirce sets out his doctrine of doubt and belief --and their relationship to inquiry and clarity of our concepts. Originally published in the Popular Science Monthly; and widely available in reprints and collections of Peirce's writings.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   250 citations  
  • (1 other version)Verisimilitude: The third period.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29.
    The modern history of verisimilitude can be divided into three periods. The first began in 1960, when Karl Popper proposed his qualitative definition of what it is for one theory to be more truthlike than another theory, and lasted until 1974, when David Miller and Pavel Trich published their refutation of Popper's definition. The second period started immediately with the attempt to explicate truthlikeness by means of relations of similarity or resemblance between states of affairs (or their linguistic representations); the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • The Foundations Of Empirical Knowledge.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1940 - London, England: Macmillan.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   125 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge.[author unknown] - 1941 - Mind 50 (199):280-293.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):613-615.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   199 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. [REVIEW]J. B. - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (8):219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Linear models in decision making.Robyn M. Dawes & Bernard Corrigan - 1974 - Psychological Bulletin 81 (2):95-106.
    A review of the literature indicates that linear models are frequently used in situations in which decisions are made on the basis of multiple codable inputs. These models are sometimes used normatively to aid the decision maker, as a contrast with the decision maker in the clinical vs statistical controversy, to represent the decision maker "paramorphically" and to "bootstrap" the decision maker by replacing him with his representation. Examination of the contexts in which linear models have been successfully employed indicates (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   102 citations  
  • Principles of Behavior. An Introduction to Behavior Theory. [REVIEW]E. N. - 1943 - Journal of Philosophy 40 (20):558-559.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   701 citations  
  • Consolations for the Specialist.Paul Feyerabend - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 197.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  • The Limits of Scientific Reasoning.David Faust - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):137-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Mind and the World-order. By G. W. Cunningham. [REVIEW]C. I. Lewis - 1929 - International Journal of Ethics 40:550.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  • Discussion. How to weight scientists' probabilities is not a big problem: Comment on Barnes.P. E. Meehl - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):283-295.
    Assuming it rational to treat other persons' probabilities as epistemically significant, how shall their judgements be weighted (Barnes [1998])? Several plausible methods exist, but theorems in classical psychometrics greatly reduce the importance of the problem. If scientists' judgements tend to be positively correlated, the difference between two randomly weighted composites shrinks as the number of judges rises. Since, for reasons such as representative coverage, minimizing bias, and avoiding elitism, we would rarely employ small numbers of judges (e.g. less than 10), (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (3 other versions)How to Make Our Ideas Clear.Charles Sanders Peirce - 1958 - Problemos 79:169-184.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   137 citations  
  • Construct validity in psychological tests.Lee J. Cronbach & P. E. Meehl - 1956 - In Herbert Feigl & Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. , Vol. pp. 1--174.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   134 citations  
  • The Miracle Argument for realism: An important lesson to be learned by generalizing from Carrier’s counter-examples.Paul E. Meehl - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):267-282.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Cliometric metatheory II: Criteria scientists use in theory appraisal and why it is rational to do so.P. Meehl - 2002 - Psychological Reports 91:339--404.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Cliometric metatheory: the actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science.P. Meehl - 1992 - Psychological Reports 71:339--467.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations