Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. [Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
    Reviewed Works:John R. Steel, A. S. Kechris, D. A. Martin, Y. N. Moschovakis, Scales on $\Sigma^1_1$ Sets.Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Scales on Coinductive Sets.Donald A. Martin, John R. Steel, The Extent of Scales in $L$.John R. Steel, Scales in $L$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   219 citations  
  • Was sierpinski right? IV.Saharon Shelah - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1031-1054.
    We prove for any $\mu = \mu^{ large enough (just strongly inaccessible Mahlo) the consistency of 2 μ = λ → [θ] 2 3 and even 2 μ = λ → [θ] 2 σ,2 for $\sigma . The new point is that possibly $\theta > \mu^+$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Changing cardinal invariants of the reals without changing cardinals or the reals.Heike Mildenberger - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):593-599.
    We show: The procedure mentioned in the title is often impossible. It requires at least an inner model with a measurable cardinal. The consistency strength of changing b and d from a regular κ to some regular δ < κ is a measurable of Mitchell order δ. There is an application to Cichon's diagram.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The cofinality spectrum of the infinite symmetric group.Saharon Shelah & Simon Thomas - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):902-916.
    Let S be the group of all permutations of the set of natural numbers. The cofinality spectrum CF(S) of S is the set of all regular cardinals λ such that S can be expressed as the union of a chain of λ proper subgroups. This paper investigates which sets C of regular uncountable cardinals can be the cofinality spectrum of S. The following theorem is the main result of this paper. Theorem. Suppose that $V \models GCH$ . Let C be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(K)=K++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • (1 other version)The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from< i> o(< i> K)=< i> K_< sup>++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Indiscernible sequences for extenders, and the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik & William J. Mitchell - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (3):273-316.
    We prove several results giving lower bounds for the large cardinal strength of a failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis. The main result is the following theorem: Theorem. Suppose κ is a singular strong limit cardinal and 2κ λ where λ is not the successor of a cardinal of cofinality at most κ. If cf > ω then it follows that o λ, and if cf = ωthen either o λ or {α: K o α+n} is confinal in κ for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • A Model in Which GCH Holds at Successors but Fails at Limits.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):550-552.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • (1 other version)[Omnibus Review].Kenneth Kunen - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):515-516.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations